Later tradition likes to rank three running-script works above all others, and the
ranking is a late convention rather than anything the Tang or Song said. But the three
are the right three to know, because between them they show what the art values: an
afternoon's improvisation, a grief-stricken draft, and a poem written in a leaking
house.
An afternoon by a stream, 353
In the spring of 353, an official named Wang Xizhi held a purification party at a
place called the Orchid Pavilion, near modern Shaoxing. A Tang account by He Yanzhi,
who got the story from a ninety-two-year-old monk with a direct line back to Wang's
descendants, gives the guest list: forty-one people, including Wang's three sons.
They sat along a winding stream, floated cups of wine down the water, and whoever the
cup stopped beside had to compose a poem. Afterward, on "silkworm-cocoon paper with a
rat-whisker brush," Wang wrote a preface for the collection: twenty-eight lines,
three hundred and twenty-four characters, on the pleasure of a fine day and the fact
that everyone at the party would die.
He Yanzhi is precise about what makes the piece remarkable, and it is not the prose.
Where a character repeats, "each was constructed in a different form," and the
character 之, a little grammatical particle that turns up constantly, appears "some
twenty times, every one transformed, with no two the same." Wang wrote it drunk, and
"after he sobered up, on other days he wrote it out again dozens and hundreds of
times, and none matched the one written at the purification." That is the whole art in
a sentence: the thing that cannot be repeated is the thing that is valued.
The Book of Jin adds the personality. Wang loved geese, and once copied out
the entire Daodejing for a Taoist priest in exchange for his flock. An old
woman selling bamboo fans was annoyed when he wrote five characters on each; he told
her to say they were by General Wang of the Right Army and ask a hundred coins, and
people fought to buy them. He rated himself, in his own words, "on a level with Zhong
Yao, and just behind Zhang Zhi in cursive." The Tang emperor Taizong, who wrote the
appraisal at the end of the biography, thought that too modest: he called Wang's
writing "entirely good and entirely beautiful," like "mist curling and dew forming,
seeming to break and yet still joined."
Taizong's admiration is why nobody alive has seen the original. He Yanzhi tells how
the preface passed down seven generations to a monk named Zhiyong, who practiced
calligraphy for thirty years in a tower and filled five large baskets with worn-out
brush tips, and then to Zhiyong's disciple Bian Cai, who hid it in a hollow he cut into
the roof beam over his bed. Taizong summoned Bian Cai three times and got nothing, so
he sent a censor named Xiao Yi disguised as a traveling scholar, who befriended the
old monk over weeks, talked him into producing the scroll to compare with some lesser
Wangs, and walked out with it. Bian Cai fainted when he found out and was dead little more
than a year later. In 649, dying at the Yuhua palace, Taizong asked his son for one thing: "What I
want is the Orchid Pavilion. Let me take it with me." He Yanzhi's four words for what
happened are that it "entered the dark palace with the immortal carriage." The four
court copyists Taizong had set to tracing it, Feng Chengsu among them, are the reason
you can see anything at all.
A draft in a dead man's hand, 758
The second piece is not fair copy at all. During the An Lushan rebellion, Yan
Zhenqing's cousin Yan Gaoqing was holding the city of Changshan when the general who
should have relieved him sat on his hands; the city fell and Gaoqing and his son
Jiming were killed. The National Palace Museum's catalogue entry records what Yan
Zhenqing's nephew, sent to collect the bodies, actually recovered: "only Gaoqing's
foot and Jiming's skull." Yan, then fifty, sat down to draft the funeral text for the
boy, and the draft is what survives: a single sheet, 29.2 by 59.6 centimeters, on which
the sentence "the traitorous minister did not come to the rescue; the lone city was
hemmed in; the father fell and the son died; the nest overturned and the eggs were
smashed" is written in a hand that visibly loses its temper.
The museum's description of the brushwork is the thing to take to the glass case:
"the whole piece is written with a single, slightly worn brush," the ink "dries and is
re-dipped" so that it runs from black to gray to scratched, and the text is "deleted,
revised and blotted" as Yan changed his mind mid-sentence. Fair copies of the text
existed; nobody kept them. The tradition kept the one with the crossings-out, because
that is the one where you can watch a man think. Yan himself died in 785, sent to
negotiate with a rebel and executed for refusing to bend.
A poem in the rain, 1082
The third is by Su Shi, the poet, in political exile in Huangzhou in 1082, during the
Cold Food festival when fires were traditionally put out. The two poems he wrote are
about a leaking hut "like a fishing boat" in endless rain, cooking cold vegetables on
wet reeds, and realizing what day it is only because he sees a crow carrying a scrap
of paper money from a grave. The National Palace Museum, which owns the scroll (34.2
centimeters high, nearly two meters long), transcribes it with two small marks that
tell you what you are looking at: in the first poem the character for "rain" is
"dotted out," and later a stray "son" is "dotted out" too. Su wrote it, made a
mistake, put a dot beside it, and kept going, and the mistakes were left in for nine
hundred years.
What people look at is the size of the characters, which swell and shrink with the
poem's mood; the museum points to the last strokes of "year," "middle," "reed" and
"paper," each dragged straight down into a long vertical that opens a column of empty
space. Su said of his own hand that "short and long, fat and thin, each has its own
bearing," which is a defense as much as a description. Eighteen years later Huang
Tingjian, the other great calligrapher of the age, added the colophon, writing bigger
than Su had, and remarking that he was only "playing the master where there is no
Buddha around." He was in the same room as the Cold Food poems when he wrote it.